Baraminology

A reader wrote in response to my earlier Conservapedia vs. Wikipedia post, disputing that Wikipedia was biased, and saying that baraminology wasn’t a (and I quote): “generally accepted or acceptable taxonomic classification system“. Well, let me classify your response as wrong. Just look at the quote from Conservapedia, which they took from Jonathan Sarfati on … Continue reading

Why Conservapedia?

I got an email asking why I link to Conservapedia rather than Wikipedia (whenever possible). Well, the simple reason is that Wikipedia is liberal, and I can’t support that. From Conservapedia’s page on Wikipedia: Wikipedia is a online encyclopedia[1] written and edited by an ad hoc assemblage of anonymous persons who are mostly, according to … Continue reading

Conservative Bible Project

Conservapedia has taken a bold new step in starting a Conservative Bible Project. I have to applaud them for their initiative here. There’s more information on their page, of course, but it boils down to making sure that there is a translation of the bible that isn’t muddled up with liberal claptrap and PC language. … Continue reading