Execution of Persecution by the Prosecution
Well, I’ve figured out what perversion of the law the Obama administration will likely use to persecute active duty Oath Keepers in the event that they disobey direct orders, and the irony is palpable. The Uniform Code of Military Justice, Article 94, says:
(a) Any person subject to this chapter who–
(1) with intent to usurp or override lawful military authority, refuse, in concert with any other person, to obey orders or otherwise do his duty or creates any violence or disturbance is guilty of mutiny;
(2) with intent to cause the overthrow or destruction of lawful civil authority, creates, in concert with any other person, revolt, violence, or other disturbance against that authority is guilty of sedition;
(3) fails to do his utmost to prevent and suppress a mutiny or sedition being committed in his presence, or fails to take all reasonable means to inform his superior commissioned officer or commanding officer of a mutiny or sedition which he knows or has reason to believe is taking place, is guilty of a failure to suppress or report a mutiny or sedition.
(b) A person who is found guilty of attempted mutiny, mutiny, sedition, or failure to suppress or report a mutiny or sedition shall be punished by death or such other punishment as a court-martial may direct.
So just because the Oath Keeper would “refuse” “to obey orders” ” with intent to usurp or override lawful military authority” then they’re subject to court-martial? You and I both know that if the Oath Keeper deems the order unconstitutional then it is no longer lawful, but what do you think the court-martial will find? I would bet that they’d side with their bosses, wouldn’t you? Military courts are inherently biased and unfair, which is why we need to keep members of our military out of them, and only use them for terrorists.